‘Kill the Buddha’
Shut the Bible up. But then open it again. Do not use it the way you did before. Do not use it as a bludgeon. Do not say I must believe it because it is the Word of God. It is not the word of God (the Quakers said this long ago) any more than a chair or table, or Shakespeare or Hamlet, is the word of God (The Quakers did not say that: I did.) The word of God is in the Bible, said George Fox; but the word of God is in you and me as well. The word in the Bible and the word in me must spark and kindle like a flash of lightning.
The Bible is a precious book. But you can make an idol if it. You can make an idol out of anything, however good. You can make an idol out of God, or Jesus. You can make an idol out of Shakespeare or Karl Marx. And, as Zen Buddhists are well aware, you can make an idol of the Buddha. ‘Walk in the Way. If the image of the Buddha rises up to block it, kill the Buddha’.
Ikons, idols, images are necessary; but you have to use them in the proper way. They are fingers pointing (Zen again). The Bible is a forestful of fingers pointing. Worship what they point to, not the fingers.
What is the proper way to use the Bible? I regard it as a big koan, not as a record of historical events. Even though it is a book of historical events, even though the events recorded may be true. How can we know if they are true or not? All we can ever say is that they are probable. What we are saved by, healed by, is the timeless truth of parable. Truth that is historical may contain a parable. I do not doubt myself that there was an actual Jesus; that the things he is reported to have said and did are based on fact. Whether they were rightly reported or interpreted I do not know.
– Sydney Carter, The Rock of Doubt
For the past two-and-a-half years, I’ve joined Pete on his chapter-a-day mission through the Bible. I wonder how many Christians actually systematically read and analyse what is in the Bible. It seems most Christians have a pick-and-mix approach to the Bible. We read the New Testament and the nice/easy Old Testament books (Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah) but neglect the others. People use individual verses or passages as a kind of talisman - words to be memorised and then recited in any context:
- Verses 1-18 of Psalm 139 feature in countless sermons, songs, books, posters, fridge magnets, etc. But verses 19-20 are ignored.
- Ezekiel 36:26 is another favourite (“I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh”). Read on a bit and God states he will do this so that the people of Israel will remember their “evil ways and wicked deeds” and thus loathe themselves…
- Someone once felt that God had given them Habakuk 1:5 to share with me (“Look at the nations and watch — and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days that you would not believe, even if you were told”). What is the amazing thing God will do? He will use the Babylonians to attack Israel and execute his judgement upon it (Hab 1:6-11).
But even Jesus bent Scripture to fit his argument (Mt 21:13). I think a bigger problem is reading the whole Bible literally, and regarding it as inerrant. A literal reading of the Bible endorses slavery:
Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. Lev 25:44-45
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property. Ex 21:20-21
Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to win their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord. Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for men Col 3:22-23
All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God’s name and our teaching may not be slandered. Those who have believing masters are not to show less respect for them because they are brothers. Instead, they are to serve them even better, because those who benefit from their service are believers, and dear to them. 1 Tim 6:1-2
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Eph 6:5
I don’t think slavery is a good idea, so I regard those sections of the Bible as culturally-determined/obsolete/incorrect/whatever-you-want-to-call-it… I do the same with some of Paul’s writings on women (1 Tim 2:11-15, 1 Cor 14:33-34, 1 Cor 11:3-8). I have a similar response when people merely quote isolated verses to me in order to condemn homosexuality (Lev 20:13, Rom 1:26-27, 1 Cor 6:9-10). Bible literalists don’t allow women to hold positions of authority and they oppose practicing homosexuals playing any part in the church. In past centuries, literalists sided with the opposition to the abolition of the slave trade.
A literal reading of the Bible sees some Christians believing that the earth is less than 10,000 years old; that Genesis 1-2 can be read as a scientific text; and that Genesis 6-8 describes a historical, global flood. A literal interpretation of the Book of Revelation holds that it describes actual historical events that will take place (throughout history most who believe this also believe that the events will occur/are occurring in their lifetime).
I don’t believe that the Bible is completely inerrant or a perfect revelation from God. Some sections are just plain silly unless you contextualise them. Biblical criticism is essential. The end. [please proceed to pick apart the holes in my argument(s)]
[T]he impossibility of arriving at a definitive interpretation of scripture is precisely what makes it scripture. The best we can do is to come to sacred writings from within our own human limitations, our own vernacular and conceptual biases. When we quote them we give them a meaning that is our own – not God’s. To know what God means is to know God. And in the words of a fifteenth-century rabbi, Joseph Albo, “If I knew Him I would be Him.” Albo was attacking the presumption that anyone has the final word on the meaning of scripture.
– James P. Carse, The Silence of God: Meditations on Prayer
further links:
Slavery:
Does God condone slavery in the Bible?
Slavery in the Bible
Why does the Bible seem to tolerate the institution of slavery?
Some Observations on Biblical Interpretation and Slavery
Homosexuality:
The Bible and Homosexuality (Liberal view)
Does the Bible approve Homosexuality? (Conservative view) [not a great site. If you can find a better one, let me know]
Creation Science:
Institute for Creation Research
Answers in Genesis
Problems with a Global Flood?
Science Science:
Talk Origins: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy
Answers to Creationist Nonsense
Problems with a Global Flood
Genesis/Evolution/Creationism:
Wikipedia - Framework Interpretation (Genesis)
Genesis 1 - WCG
Wikipedia - Theistic Evolution
Wikipedia - Progressive Creationism
Wikipedia - Young Earth Creationism
Crazy End Times sites:
Endtime Ministries
End Times Report
Prophecy Update
Contender Ministries